Question:
“In Looking at the representation of Jesus in Contemporary (and recent) cinema, analyse the way that films have composted different images of Jesus to fit with recent or current events, cultural perspectives of social/political movements.
Cinematic Representations of Jesus
Introduction
Cinematic portrayals of Jesus have become more and more popular overtime because they allow filmmakers to interpret Gospel stories in their own unique contexts and portray Jesus and Christ Figures who ultimately are the amalgamation of text and context. As a story that has been told for thousands of years, the portrayal of Jesus in cinema is an important mode of delivery as it gives insights into the perception of who Jesus might of been and also how his story follows Jungian archetypes of the hero’s journey. This essay aims to analyse three films through their representation of a Jesus or Christ figure, and how this representation is reflective of their current social and political contexts, as well as their relevant place in history. The three films analyzed with be Denys Acrand’s Jesus Of Montreal (1989), Terry Jones’ Monty Python’s Life of Brian (1979) and Andrew Adamson’s The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe (2005). Through the analysis of these films, this essay hopes to present the view that representations of Jesus in film are reflective of their cultural context, and are all possessive certain qualities that are central to the Jesus film Genre.
Christ and Jesus Figures
The Jesus film genre is arguably the most significant medium through which popular culture of this century has absorbed its interpretations of the Gospel stories of the New testament and their impressions of its founder, Jesus Christ (Nguyen, 2010, p.183). The use of cinema is an important medium because it allows a broad circulation of views, and also that the stories produced are designed to appeal to any viewers no matter what their background and education (Reinhartz, 1998, p.1), (Nguyen, 2010, p.183). Biopics of Jesus, or feature film biographies, (Reinhartz, 2007, p.1) are depictions of the life of Jesus that follow the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John (Nguyen,2010,p.187). They can either follow the story of Christ – like figures – whose stories follow loosely, or quite closely, the complete story of Jesus; focusing on The Passion and the resurrection as the climactic feature of the film, this type of portrayal of Jesus can also be shown through figures that represent Christ such as art, elements, images or fictional characters (Scalia, 2001, p.77) or the Jesus – like figure; where the films plot line is separate from the trials of Jesus, but Jesus appears in the film through symbols or mention (Scalia, 2001, p.77).
The film Jesus of Montreal, Directed by Denys Acrand, produced in 1989, is an example of a Jesus figure because of its portrayal of a Jesus – like character in a contemporary setting. The film follows the plight of actors who are hired to present a passion play at a small town Catholic church (Acrand, 1989), which reflects the film’s take of the Jesus story in a modern day small community (Bakker, 2009, 51). As the film progress’, the characters lives come to represent those of they are playing in the theatre, with the protagonist, Daniel, becoming a figure of Christ after he falls from the cross during a performance of the passion play and dies (Scalia, 2001, p.78). In this portrayal of Jesus, He is seen as a human; this is especially evident through the final crucifixion scene in which Jesus’ organs are donated for transplants so that they may save other’s lives – it is through this Jesus is resurrected (Gilmour, 2005, p.322). The confrontation of Satan in the story is represented through the highly materialistic and hollow audience members of the audience, as when Daniel is offered power and glory by a lawyer, just Jesus was offered the kingdoms of the world and their treasures for worshipping Satan (Reinhartz, 1998, p.4). The use of capitalism to symbolize evil is evidence of this films social context as at this time as major social concerns were of capitalism and the fear that major companies and governments where going to eventually control the lives of everyone in the world (from a Western view).This contemporary view of Jesus is a reflection of its time as audiences identified with the depictions of evil corporations representing Satan and the humanist portrayal of Jesus was accepted as it followed the storyline of the Gospels, even if it wasn’t historically accurate.
Portrayals of Jesus through cinematic representation
The challenge that these biopics face is the amalgamation of the context of the past; the text of the Gospels, and the modern cultural context in which the film is set (Nguyen, 2010, p.187), (Mahan, 2002, p.2), (Brunstad, 2001, p.146). As Jesus is a central religious figure to many people, audiences expect a degree of historical accuracy when Jesus is depicted in film. This can be a problematic enterprise also for the opposite as the film must work as an entire exercise to relate to viewers that may have no personal investment in the character of Jesus at all (Mahan, 2002, p.2), (Brunstad, 2001, p.146). Audiences generally recognize a historical Jesus through the subject of the film, the costumes and surroundings of the film – eg sandals and bathrobes and ancient towns and the language that will be used in the film such as biblical English, Latin or Hebrew (Reinhartz, 2007, p.2).
Understandably, film makers cannot be completely accurate to their portrayal of Jesus as it is not recorded in the Gospel His day to day life and habits, thoughts on the events in his life and the environments in which these events occurred (Reinhartz, 2007, p.9). It is through these gaps, however, that filmmakers are able to insert the cultural contexts, political ideals and current events that are effecting the world in which they are created (Reinhartz, 2007, p.9). However, these historical perspectives can be changed to portray the same story of a Christ – like figure, as long as they keep key portrayals of Jesus’ life such as the passion scene’s, the crucifixion and the resurrection (Reinhartz, 2007, p.3). This can be demonstrated through the analysis of Adam Anderson’s The Chronicles of Narnia as the key character, the lion Aslan, is an effective depiction of Christ despite the fact that it is an anthropomorphic Lion.
The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe (Anderson, 2005), is a religious film which follows the exploration of heaven, depicted as “Narnia” by children escaping the Cold War in England. The leading character, a lion by the name of Aslan, is the embodiment of Jesus – like figure as he is presented in the film to face the same trials as Jesus faced – such as sacrifice and resurrection for the greater good (Chapman,2012, p.3). Aslan is presented as an immediate Jesus – like figure through language, film techniques, and the passion scenes depicted in the film. Language used such as “Welcome in the Lions name” , (Anderson, 2005) is indicative of Aslan’s role as a Christ like figure in the film (Smietana, 2006, p.33). Film techniques to represent Aslan as a Christ figure are used through placing Aslan higher than other characters, through the representation of Him as a quiet, pensive and wise character, and attributing him to the magic that restores the beauty of Narnia. The Passion scenes in The Chronicles of Narnia are perhaps the most indicative of Aslan’s representation as Jesus as He sacrifices Himself on a stone table (representing the crucifix) to save Edmund and the fate of Narnia – such as when Jesus died on the cross in order for humankind to be forgiven (Anderson, 2005). These depictions however are also within context that is addressed within the movie also – The Cold War.
The Cold War (1947 – 1991) influenced the depiction of the Jesus – like figure in The Chronicles of Narnia through the interpretation that Aslan could simultaneously represent the role of The United States in the victory of The Cold War. In 1946, Stalin declared that the capitalism of the West was incompatible with Russian ideals, and this is represented in the film through the bombings of London (Chapman, 2012, p.3). America responded by signing the Truman Doctrine, which pledged assistance to the European countries that resisted communist take overs (Chapman, 2012, p.3). Theorist Roger Chapman suggests that this is represented in Narnia through Aslan’s rescue of the Pevensie Children from their world’s which are disrupted by the potential bombing of their family home (Chapman, 2012, p.4). This representation of Jesus shows the use of another Jesus – like figure to convey the portrayal of Jesus as a character who sacrifices’ their life for the greater good of the world around them. This portrayal is also indicative of Jungian Hero archetypes and how they support the portrayal of Jesus in film.
Jungian Archetypes of Jesus and the Self
Portrayals of Jesus in film may follow the tradition historical story recorded by the Gospel, but are also all indicative of the hero archetype discovered by Psychologist Carl Jung. Jung believed that there are universal patterns that produce meaning and guide development that can be found in every human being on earth (Roesler, 2012, p.224). These innate forms and patterns of behaviours and perceptions are common to all through the theory of the collective unconscious, which Jung believed everyone access’ through an intrinsically known source (Paganopoulos, 2010, p.2), (Roesler, 2012, p.224) . The archetype explored in Jesus films is that of the hero and the self. The hero myth centers around the hero’s journey, first termed by psychologist Joseph Campbell. The hero’s journey starts when they are situated within the confines of their family environment, which shows the broader social and political context that will either influence or respond to the hero’s growing sense of capabilities and sense of mission (Reinhartz, 1998, p.3). Secondly, the hero encounters an antagonist relationship which causes them conflict (Reinhartz, 1998, p.3). The conflict is then resolved through an event that allows the hero to express or their primary message to their own audience and the film audience (Reinhartz, 1998, p.3). This portrayal of the hero’s journey can be seen through Jesus in Montreal and The Chronicles of Narnia, but also in the last film, Terry Jone’s Monty Python’s Life of Brian (1979).
Although Monty Python’s Life Of Brian is in essence a spoof of the Jesus film genre, it cleverly incorporates the hero archetype to express the view that Jesus and Christ – like figures do not have to necessarily be religious in nature. Following the story of a man, Brian, who is wrongly assumed to be Jesus of Nazareth, Monty Python not – so subtly critiques the assumptions of Jesus’ life that have been portrayed not only in film but through the continuation of scripture and Gospel stories. The fact that Brian is obviously and explicitly stated to not be Jesus allowed this film to successfully spoof the genre without being charged with blasphemous content (Reinhartz, 1998, p.4). The portrayal of Jesus in Life Of Brian is that of a Christ – like figure, who is only vaguely mentioned in the actual film, but is represented in whole through the films plot similarity to that of the story of Jesus.
The cultural context of this film comments on the blind faith of old Christian practitioners by parodying their blind faith through such scenes as when Brian loses his shoe and it is seen as a ‘sign by the messiah’ (Jones, 1979). Another comment the film makes is the satirical comments on British Left Wing politics and through the iconic line of “What have the Romans ever done for us?” at which point the listeners outline all forms of positive aspects of the Roman occupation such as sanitation, medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, a fresh water system, public health and peace, followed by “what have the Romans ever done for us except sanitation, medicine, education…” (Jones, 1979). The representation of a Christ – like figure in this film is used to parody the genre, however, it is cleverly utilized to show the political context of the time in order to present the filmmakers view on past issues that are still current in modern day contexts.
Conclusion
Through the exploration of these films, it can be seen that the portrayal of Jesus has the central characteristics of following either a Christ or Jesus – like figure; depending on the way that the filmmaker decides to develop the plot. This is through either following the historical depictions of Jesus as true to their representations in the Gospels or through Jesus representations that follow the historical stories but not in a historical context. The use of Jungian archetypes support the exposition of Jesus films as they provide a fundamental characteristic that is found in every Jesus film. As the archetypes are shared through the collective unconscious, they are able to be understood by people around the world – thus resonating with the Jesus story. The different representations of Jesus are expressive of the film’s respective social, political and culture contexts – such as the humanist perspective in Acrand’s Jesus of Montreal, The Cold War context of Anderson’s The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe and the political and satirical religious contexts of British politics and blind faith in Jone’s Monty Python’s The Life of Brian.
The existence of these contexts give evidence to the fact that cinematic portrayals of Jesus are a vehicle to express concerns and anxieties of the film’s social, political and cultural context, and are able to do this with the support of the hero archetype, which is a common factor within all Jesus films.
References
Acrand, D. (Director). (1989). Jesus of Montreal [Motion picture]. Canada: Centre national de la Cinematicographie.
Adamson, A. (Director). (2005). The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe [Motion picture]. UK: Walt Disney Pictures.
Bakker, F. L. (2009). Chapter two. In The challenge of the silver screen: An analysis of the cinematic portraits of Jesus, Rama, Buddha and Muhammad (pp. 42 – 51). Leiden: Brill.
Brunstad, P. R. (2001). Jesus in Hollywood – The Cinematic Jesus in a Christological and Contemporary perspective. Studia Theologica, 55(1), 145-156. Retrieved from http://cf5pm8sz2l.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Jesus+in+Hollywood+-+The+Cinematic+Jesus+in+a+Christological+and+Contemporary+Perspective&rft.jtitle=Studia+Theologica+-+Nordic+Journal+of+Theology&rft.au=Brunstad%2C+Paul+Otto&rft.date=2001-12-01&rft.issn=0039-338X&rft.eissn=1502-7791&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=145&rft.epage=156&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F003933801753330633&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1080_003933801753330633
Chapman, R. (2012). The Lion, the Witch and the Cold War: Political Meanings in the Religious Writings of C.S. Lewis. Journal of Religion and Popular culture, 24(1), 1-14. Retrieved from http://cf5pm8sz2l.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/summon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Lion%2C+the+Witch+and+the+Cold+War%3A+political+meanings+in+the+religious+writings+of+C.S.+Lewis&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+Religion+and+Popular+Culture&rft.au=Chapman%2C+Roger&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.pub=University+of+Toronto+Press&rft.issn=1703-289X&rft.eissn=1703-289X&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=293109468
Gilmour, P. (n.d.). Text and Context: The Passion of the Christ and Other Jesus Films. Religious Education, 100(3), 311-325. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.library.uq.edu.au/docview/199375879?accountid=14723
Jones, T. (Director). (1979). Life of Brian [Motion picture]. UK: Handmade films.
Mahan , J. (2002). Celluloid Savior: Jesus in the Movies. Journal of Religion and Film, 6(1). Retrieved from http://www.unomaha.edu/jrf/celluloid.htm
Nguyen, H. T. (2009). The Quest for the Cinematic Jesus: Scholarly Explorations in Jesus Films. Currents in Biblical Research, 8(2), 183-206. doi:10.1177/1476993X09341494
Paganopoulos, M. (2010). Jesus Christ and Billy the Kid as Archetypes of the Self in American Cinema. Journal of Religion and Popular Culture, 22(1), 1-23. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.library.uq.edu.au/docview/748979155
Reinhartz, A. (2007). Introduction: From Holy Scripture to Silver Screen. In Jesus of Hollywood (pp. 1 – 25). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reinhartz, A. (1998). Jesus in film: Hollywood Perspectives on the Jewishness of Jesus. Journal of Religion and Film, 2(2), 2-6. doi:10.1086/526361
Roesler, C. (2012). Are Archetypes transmitted more by culture than biology? Questions arising from conceptualizations of the archetype. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 57, 223- 246. doi:10.1111/1.1468.5922.2011.01963
Scalia, B. (2001). Re-Figuring Jesus: Christ and Christ-Figures in “Jesus of Montreal”. Religion and Literature, 33(1), 75-90. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40059889
Smietana , B. (2006). Lessons from the Lion. U.S Catholic, 71(4), 32-35. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.library.uq.edu.au/docview/225357882